Microdelegation

If you work in almost any role in a project-oriented organization, you probably know too well what micromanagement means. Briefly, micromanagement is inappropriate interference by supervisors in the work of subordinates. [Brenner 2007.1] It is a style of supervision in which the supervisor insists on receiving reports of progress on the subordinate's work that are so detailed and frequent that they deprive the subordinate of any meaningful degree of autonomy. The demands of the supervisor can become so burdensome that they constrain the subordinate's productivity. In extreme cases, involvement of the supervisor in the work of the subordinate can be so intense that it compromises the supervisor's own performance. Although this description is expressed in terms of an individual subordinate, it applies to subordinate groups or teams as well.

Microdelegation is to delegation as micromanagement is to management. To delegate to someone is to invest that person with some degree of Responsibility, Authority, and Accountability relative to some element of the organizational mission. [Brenner 2024.1] For example, the Chief Financial Officer might delegate to you the task of coordinating a "red team" review of the quarterly financial reports. Then, to some extent, you would be responsible for organizing the review — recruiting a team, setting a time, gathering materials, producing a report, and so on.

To microdelegate is therefore to delegate in such a way as to compromise the autonomy of the delegatee. The microdelegating supervisors in our example omit no detail in charging their subordinates — they list the titles of the financial reports, they specify the conference rooms, the names of the attendees, the dates and times of the meetings, and so on.

My use of the term microdelegation

Having never seen the word microdelegation, I felt free to define it in this way. But as it turns out, others have already used it in other ways. Emal uses the term to denote a more effective style of delegation. [Emal 2024] In almost the opposite sense, more closely aligned to how I use the term here, Morrison notes that, "Learning and growth can only happen if there's space for it."

Now, having learned that the term is in use in such different ways, I feel free to appropriate it in the way I need it here.

The costs of microdelegating

The Microdelegation is to delegation as
micromanagement is to managementurge to microdelegate probably springs from sources similar to the sources of the urge to micromanage. It's reasonable to suppose that the microdelegator fails to balance two attributes of microdelegation — first, the approach to the task, and second, the self-esteem of the subordinate.

The approach to the task

Microdelegators can tend to be resistant to the change in their own roles that is an element of any healthy delegation. As Morrison puts it, "I wonder if micro-delegation, like micromanagement, reflects a reluctance to let go of power and control and brings those unconscious trust issues into play that can get in the way of development and autonomous working." Except in highly regulated activities, the belief that the delegator knows the only feasible approach to the task is almost surely unjustified.

The self-esteem of the subordinate

The microdelegator unintentionally communicates to the subordinate an unspoken message of distrust in the subordinate. In Morrison's terms, the "…temptation to impart experience or knowledge in order to ensure something comes out exactly as if you'd done it yourself can make the person on the receiving end feel undervalued, untrusted, while eroding autonomy, creating tension, etc etc etc etc…"

In this way, a pattern of microdelegation can be a contributing factor in elevated turnover and substandard performance among delegatees.

Last words

As a technique of covert bullying, some abusers take actions that appear to be microdelegation. They might do this because the penalties for microdelegation are less severe than the penalties for bullying. But be clear: it isn't microdelegation — it's bullying.

In genuine microdelegation, by unintentionally sending a message of distrust of the delegatee, the microdelegator can cause the subordinate to lack confidence whenever the subordinate's process deviates in any way from the subordinate's perception of the microdelegator's process. That loss of confidence can morph into risk aversion and a feeling of being psychologically unsafe. And from there, it's a short step to organizational rigidity and obsolescence.  Top  

Are your projects always (or almost always) late and over budget? Are your project teams plagued by turnover, burnout, and high defect rates? Turn your culture around. Read 52 Tips for Leaders of Project-Oriented Organizations, filled with tips and techniques for organizational leaders. Order Now!

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Conflict Management:

New Ideas: Judging

When groups work together to solve problems, they eventually evaluate the ideas they generate. They sometimes reject perfectly good ideas, while accepting some really boneheaded ones. How can we judge new ideas more effectively?

Impasses in Group Decision Making: III

In group decision making, impasses can develop. Some are related to the substance of the issue at hand. With some effort, we can usually resolve substantive impasses. But treating nonsubstantive impasses in the same way doesn't work. Here's why.

Preventing Toxic Conflict: II

Establishing norms for respectful behavior is perhaps the most effective way to reduce the incidence of toxic conflict at work. When we all understand and subscribe to a particular way of treating each other, we can all help prevent trouble.

Conversation Irritants: I

Conversations at work can be frustrating even when everyone tries to be polite, clear, and unambiguous. But some people actually try to be nasty, unclear, and ambiguous. Here's Part I of a small collection of their techniques.

Bad Trouble: Misdirection

When Bad Trouble develops at work we have a chance to see what our organizational cultures are made of. Many of our colleagues respond constructively. When they don't, misdirection tactics are popular. Here's a little catalog of misdirection responses.

See also Conflict Management for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming July 30: What the Dunning-Kruger Effect Actually Is

Although the Dunning-Kruger Effect is widely recognized, people describe it — and understand it — in many different ways. Some of these expressions are misleading. Proceed with caution. Available here and by RSS on July 30.

And on August 6: Leaving High-Touch Jobs: Why

High-touch jobs are those that require that we work closely with colleagues, teammates, clients, or suppliers. Because leaving such positions affects the people we leave behind, we would all be better off if we took steps to mitigate those effects. Here are some suggestions. Available here and by RSS on August 6.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenaXXxGCwVgbgLZDuRner@ChacDjdMAATPdDNJnrSwoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info