The Expectation-Disruption Connection

In an episode of The West Wing, a television drama series about the U.S. Presidency, the "President" comments about the consequences of a possible outbreak of Mad Cow Disease. He says, "The most costly disruptions always happen when something we take completely for granted stops working for a minute." To take for granted is "to assume as true, real, or expected," or "to value too lightly." [Mish 2005] In this case, the President is remarking on the societal disruption that could occur if the U.S. beef industry "stops working." And he's saying that the disruption would be costly because "we take [the beef industry] completely for granted."

Recent events have provided examples of the power of the "President's" observation: the Flint water crisis, which began in 2014 and is ongoing [Robertson 2020]; the Texas power generation failure of winter 2020-2021 [Penney 2021]; and the COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2019. These three examples illustrate how we took for granted, respectively, the water we drink, the electric power we use, and the air we breathe.

Although these examples are regional or global in scale, an inquiry into possible organizational analogs can be fruitful. In this post I offer two insights for organizations based on the connection between Disruptions and our Expectations.

Disruptions point the way to needed innovations

In May of 2021, extortionists forced the shutdown of pipelines owned and operated by Colonial Pipeline Company. [Shear 2021] The company paid a ransom of approximately USD 5 million to resume operations after a five-day disruption, which resulted in gasoline shortages along the East coast of the United States.

The incident illustrates — not for the first time — that many operators of network infrastructure within companies incorrectly expect that their equipment is safe from cyberattack. One way to address this problem is to expect individual companies to educate themselves about cyberdefense. That is the current approach, and it usually emphasizes technological improvements. This approach places cyberdefense directly in conflict with short-term financial results.

As the Colonial "The most costly disruptions always happen
when something we take completely for
granted stops working for a minute."
— "President Bartlet" of the West Wing
Pipeline incident demonstrates, the current approach is not working well. A more innovative approach would recognize that industry as a whole has a cybersecurity problem. The innovation that's needed here is one that guides individual companies to work more collaboratively to enhance cybersecurity. This problem is perhaps best addressed at a national or global scale.

Expectations indicate unrecognized risks

For any given organizational initiative, if we can identify an expectation, we can then ask, "What if events defy our expectation?" The answer to that question can be expressed as a risk for that initiative. For example, consider a project whose objective is extending a software asset by adding new capabilities. We might expect that if we supply enough resources and time, the project will be successful. Moreover, we might expect that subsequent projects of a similar nature will also be successful.

But such expectations haven't always aligned with events. Over time, repeatedly extending software assets has resulted in increased maintenance costs and general difficulty in making enhancements. The phenomenon is known as software brittleness. Software project managers would do will to regard increased software brittleness as a risk of projects whose objectives are extension of existing assets — a risk that must be mitigated.

Disruptions are evident when they occur, but expectations can remain unrecognized for indefinite periods. That's why investing effort in identifying unrecognized expectations can be so fruitful. As an example, asking questions of the form, "What if X is removed from this situation" can help. What else can you do to find the expectations of yours that can connect to disruptions?  Top    Next Issue

Are your projects always (or almost always) late and over budget? Are your project teams plagued by turnover, burnout, and high defect rates? Turn your culture around. Read 52 Tips for Leaders of Project-Oriented Organizations, filled with tips and techniques for organizational leaders. Order Now!

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Organizational Change:

Workplace Taboos and Change

In the workplace, some things can't be discussed — they are taboo. When we're aware of taboos, we can choose when to obey them, and when to be more flexible. When we're unaware of them, they can limit our ability to change.

Plenty of Blame to Go Around

You may have heard the phrase "plenty of blame to go around," or maybe you've even used it yourself. Although it sometimes does bring an end to immediate finger pointing, it also validates blame as a general approach. Here's how to end the blaming by looking ahead.

Power, Authority, and Influence: A Systems View

Power, Authority, and Influence are often understood as personal attributes. To fully grasp how they function in organizations, we must adopt a systems view.

Patching Up the Cracks

When things repeatedly "fall through the cracks," we're not doing the best we can. How can we deal with the problem of repeatedly failing to do what we need to do? How can we patch up the cracks?

Improvement Bias

When we set about improving how our organizations do things, we expose ourselves to the risk of finding opportunities for improvement that offer very little improvement, while we overlook others that could make a real difference. Cognitive biases play a role.

See also Organizational Change and Organizational Change for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming January 22: Storming: Obstacle or Pathway?

The Storming stage of Tuckman's model of small group development is widely misunderstood. Fighting the storms, denying they exist, or bypassing them doesn't work. Letting them blow themselves out in a somewhat-controlled manner is the path to Norming and Performing. Available here and by RSS on January 22.

And on January 29: A Framework for Safe Storming

The Storming stage of Tuckman's development sequence for small groups is when the group explores its frustrations and degrees of disagreement about both structure and task. Only by understanding these misalignments is reaching alignment possible. Here is a framework for this exploration. Available here and by RSS on January 29.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenjTnUayrCbSnnEcYfner@ChacdcYpBKAaMJgMalFXoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info