Meandering Monologues in Meetings: Engagement

Last time I began an exploration of the nature and effects of meandering monologues in meetings. As a reminder, a meandering monologue is a long, rambling, speech by one of the meeting attendees. It is so rambling that even the person delivering the monologue can seem to lose track of the point — if they ever had a point. As I noted, wasting time is perhaps the most obvious effect of meandering monologues. But other effects might be even more costly. For example, consider the effects of meandering monologues on the degree of engagement of other attendees.

Engagement is important because it affects the quality of the meeting's output. Even more important, it affects attendance at future meetings, and thus the output of those future meetings. As in the previous post, I use the term monospeaker to refer to the person who's engaging in a meandering monologue.

How meandering monologues can suppress engagement

These next four characteristics of meandering monologues reduce the value of the meeting by reducing attendee engagement. Repetitiousness is (ahem) making a repeat appearance.

Repetitiousness

As I noted last time, repetitious monologues waste meeting time. But they do much more. Although some people can tolerate repetitiousness, those who have a low tolerance for repetition can feel compelled to alleviate their pain. They "check out" of the meeting by muting the audio, going for coffee, playing tetris, or shopping for an anniversary gift.

Repetitiousness by a monospeaker thus deprives us of participation by others in attendance. But it affects future meetings as well. Those who cannot tolerate repetitiousness might decline future meeting invitations, hoping that if anything important happened they would hear about it by some other means. If they don't feel safe enough to decline future invitations, or to skip meetings altogether, they might claim schedule conflicts to make future meetings more difficult to schedule, thus reducing the frequency of meetings.

Many different unconnected elements

The monospeaker's words might not always lead to a clear conclusion or central idea. If there is a central idea, it can be so poorly expressed that it would be difficult to understand even if it weren't awash in irrelevance.

Moreover, debates can erupt among those who were able to remain connected enough to the monologue to form conjectures about what its main point might be. Because these debates don't address the mission of the meeting, they are another source of motivation to disengage from the meeting.

Breathtaking span of issues presented

The monospeaker might digress from the main point, introducing related but not always relevant ideas. In the more complex cases, understanding the digressions can require specialized expertise or detailed recollection of past events that only a few attendees possess, and which is otherwise irrelevant to the mission of the meeting.

This kind of digression is especially useful to monospeakers whose intention is to demonstrate to the attendees their own superiority and value. While that might be their intention, reciting a disorganized litany of arcane incidents or beliefs is unlikely to produce success.

Clouds of irrelevant detail

A useful metaphor for this factor — clouds of irrelevant detail — is the needle in the haystack. By providing an enormous amount of detail, much of it irrelevant, the monospeaker compels the other attendees to dig through it all before they can determine whether it contains anything of value.

Because most people choose not to engage in excavation, the monspeaker's words largely escape scrutiny. A common response to being assigned the task of organizing the details is "No, thank you."

Last words

The behavior that I'm calling meandering monologue is essentially a performance issue. It cannot be addressed effectively on a peer-to-peer basis; addressing it is the supervisor's responsibility. Fortunately, because this particular performance issue occurs in settings in which there are many witnesses, most likely, the monospeaker's supervisor is well aware of the issue. Failure of the supervisor to take effective action is a performance issue of the supervisor.   First issue in this series   Top    Next Issue

Do you spend your days scurrying from meeting to meeting? Do you ever wonder if all these meetings are really necessary? (They aren't) Or whether there isn't some better way to get this work done? (There is) Read 101 Tips for Effective Meetings to learn how to make meetings much more productive and less stressful — and a lot more rare. Order Now!

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Effective Meetings:

Mastering Q and A

The question-and-answer exchanges that occur during or after presentations rarely add much to the overall effort. But how you deal with questions can be a decisive factor in how your audience evaluates you and your message.

Characterization Risk

To characterize is to offer a description of a person, event, or concept. Characterizations are usually judgmental, and usually serve one side of a debate. And they often make trouble.

Favor Symmetric Virtual Meetings

Virtual meetings are notorious for generating more frustration than useful output. One cause of the difficulties is asymmetry in the way we connect to virtual meetings.

How to Hijack Meetings

Recognizing the tactics meeting hijackers use is the first step to reducing the incidence of this abuse. Here are some of those tactics.

Virtual Blowhards

Controlling meeting blowhards is difficult enough in face-to-face meetings, but virtual meetings present next-level problems, because techniques that work face-to-face are unavailable. Here are eight tactics for dealing with virtual blowhards.

See also Effective Meetings for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming August 6: Leaving High-Touch Jobs: Why

High-touch jobs are those that require that we work closely with colleagues, teammates, clients, or suppliers. Because leaving such positions affects the people we leave behind, we would all be better off if we took steps to mitigate those effects. Here are some suggestions. Available here and by RSS on August 6.

And on August 13: Leaving High-Touch Jobs: How

High-touch jobs require that we work closely with colleagues, teammates, clients, or suppliers. Because choosing to leave such a job affects all these people, and the person departing, we would do well find a path that respects all involved. Here are some suggestions. Available here and by RSS on August 13.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenaXXxGCwVgbgLZDuRner@ChacDjdMAATPdDNJnrSwoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info