On Planning in Plan-Hostile Environments: II

At the highest level, plans are little more than specifications for collaborative activity. They describe the resources, relationships, and choreography that guide the people who will be executing the plans as they work together to reach their shared objectives. But no plan is ever complete, because all plans are executed inside an environment of some kind. Business plans are executed within a market; project plans within a strategic plan; employee performance plans within an organization.

When we devise a plan we make assumptions about the environment within which we intend to execute it. One common, if tacit, assumption is that the environment will be at least somewhat supportive of the plan. We assume that the plan and its hosting environment are compatible.

Factors that lead to planning difficulty

Some environments have properties that make them hostile to all plans. I explored three of those properties last time: scope creep, a focus on project management rather than people management, and one-size-fits-all policies. Here are three more.

Ambiguity of roles and responsibilities

Ambiguity of roles and responsibilities encourages those with even the most limited ambitions to take steps to enhance their own status. Because the success rate for plans is so poor, people try to "help." They're tempted to push the boundaries of their roles to prevent failure.

By reaching beyond the limits of what others understand as their roles, people can (intentionally or not) disrupt plans that assume more limited definitions of those roles.

Elevated incidence of miscommunication

Because everyone is under extreme time pressure, they communicate by messaging instead of face-to-face. And they do it hurriedly, which elevates the chance of misunderstanding.

When things go awry, and the overall approach changes to respond to the problems, not everyone is informed at the same time. Some people are following the old plan, some are following he new plan, and some the new-new plan. Miscommunications abound.

Unrealistic schedules

One way to seem to make up for lost time is to set unrealistic schedules. They help us maintain the delusion that the previous schedule was achievable. It was never possible, and creating a new unachievable schedule won't change that.

Unrealistic schedules are little more than tactics for avoiding conveying to Management the whole, sad truth about our desperate situation.

Reorganization(s)

Although reorganizations do often produce efficiencies, the savings usually appear at the scale of the enterprise. At the scale of the individual project or task, the effects can be less helpful. The fundamental problem is that reorganizations sometimes sever existing working relationships unnecessarily. People are then compelled to build new relationships, and that takes time and resources.

A second difficulty is that champions of reorganizations sometimes oversell expected efficiencies. The new workloads aren't always reasonable and rebalancing workflows can take time.

Factions and polarization

Political factions and polarization within the organization can act as sources of turmoil for the indefinite future, as political opponents of the advocates of the plan seize opportunities to deflect plans into directions more compatible with their own agendas.

The effects of factionalism and polarization can appear even before execution begins. Anticipating attacks, some planners include defenses against those attacks in the plans from the outset. This anticipatory defense makes plans more complicated than they need otherwise be, which increases costs, stretches schedules, and enhances risks.

Even more

Here are a few more factors:

• Unresolved conflicts
• Past errors unaddressed
• Leaders more concerned with personal success than with enterprise success
• Organic process development has led to burdensome processes
• Inadequate resources: equipment and personnel

I'm sure there are more. rbrenubcqSvusyBsQaEDwner@ChacfhuriyFKgDguTpuYoCanyon.comSend them along and I'll add them to the list.   First issue in this series    Next issue in this series   Top    Next Issue

Projects never go quite as planned. We expect that, but we don't expect disaster. How can we get better at spotting disaster when there's still time to prevent it? How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts is filled with tips for executives, senior managers, managers of project managers, and sponsors of projects in project-oriented organizations. It helps readers learn the subtle cues that indicate that a project is at risk for wreckage in time to do something about it. It's an ebook, but it's about 15% larger than "Who Moved My Cheese?" Just . Order Now! .

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Workplace Politics:

Devious Political Tactics: Divide and Conquer: II

While most leaders try to achieve organizational unity, some do use divisive tactics to maintain control, or to elevate performance by fostering competition. Here's Part II of a series exploring the risks of these tactics.

Social Entry Strategies: II

When we first engage with a group at work, we employ social entry strategies to make places for ourselves to carry out our responsibilities, and to find enjoyment and fulfillment at work. Here's Part II of a little catalog of social entry strategies.

Projects as Proxy Targets: II

Most projects have both supporters and detractors. When a project has been approved and execution begins, some detractors don't give up. Here's Part II of a catalog of tactics detractors use to sow chaos.

Conversation Despots

Some people insist that conversations reach their personally favored conclusions, no matter what others want. Here are some of their tactics.

Allocating Airtime: II

Much has been said about people who don't get a fair chance to speak at meetings. We've even devised processes intended to more fairly allocate speaking time. What's happening here?

See also Workplace Politics and Workplace Politics for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming May 28: Mismanaging Project Managers: Leadership

Most organizations hold project managers accountable for project performance. But they don't hold Project Sponsors or other Senior Managers accountable for the consequences of their actions when they interfere with the project manager's ability to lead the project team. Available here and by RSS on May 28.

And on June 4: white-collar contractor sabotage

Modern firms in competitive, dynamic markets draw on many types of employer/employee relationships, including contractors. By providing privileges and perks preferentially among these different types, they risk creating a caldron of resentments that can reduce organizational effectiveness. Available here and by RSS on June 4.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenubcqSvusyBsQaEDwner@ChacfhuriyFKgDguTpuYoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info