Voluntary turnover after a period of difficulty for job-seekers is perhaps the most expensive form of turnover, because that's when capable people leave. When we talk of retention, it's these people we most often have in mind.
We usually compare the benefits of retention to the cost of hiring replacements and bringing them "up to speed." But new hires also depress the productivity of existing employees. For instance, existing employees have to build relationships with new people; they have to support the informal orientation that continues after hiring; and they're more likely to voluntarily terminate, or get scooped up from afar by the people who left.
Since these effects, and others, are "off the books," retention is worth far more than we realize. The actual returns on retention investment therefore justify examining new possibilities.
The most obvious tactics involve compensation and benefits, but since any organization can offer these items, they have relatively low return on investment. By contrast, exploiting the unique attributes of your organization can yield better results, because competitive organizations can't match them.
The global economy is gradually assuming a configuration in which retention will become a competitive advantage. We can continue using the same tired tactics, and continue working with whoever stays — or we can try some new approaches, and see what happens. Here are some retention tactics that are likely to have higher returns.
- Make life easy
- Help people with errands by providing access to services on-site or near-site: day care, car wash, banking, dry cleaning, health club, and convenience market. Or form a joint effort with your business neighbors. In that critical stay-or-move discussion between two spouses, high quality of life strengthens the arguments of anyone who advocates staying.
- Use flextime and telecommuting
- Exploiting the unique
attributes of your
organization can yield
match themTwo-income and single-parent families are especially burdened by rigid schedules. For roles compatible with flextime or telecommuting, find a way to make it happen. The reduction of load on your internal resources alone will fund the program, but you'll also gain a recruiting tool.
- Support discount programs
- Provide or facilitate services that fit your demographics: movie and theater tickets, subsidized cafeterias, mass transit passes, health club discounts, and wholesale club memberships. These program costs are mostly administrative, and administration can be automated. See "Food for Thought," Point Lookout for May 22, 2002, for more.
- Emphasize recognition, education, growth, and opportunity
- Good people need new and more significant challenges and responsibilities, and they want to know that their achievements matter. Offering them that is easier than you think. For instance, you can subsidize adult learning.
- Stop driving them out
- Rumors, archaic and draconian policies, ongoing destructive conflict, and toxic politics do more to drive people away than anything you can do to keep them on. When you apply significant resources to resolving these issues, retention might be the least of the benefits. See "Practice Positive Politics," Point Lookout for August 31, 2005, for more.
Most job shifters convince themselves that their new jobs are steps up, and maybe they are. But people do tend to overestimate these opportunities. It's a grass-is-greener thing, so make your own grass as green as it can be. Top Next Issue
Are your projects always (or almost always) late and over budget? Are your project teams plagued by turnover, burnout, and high defect rates? Turn your culture around. Read 52 Tips for Leaders of Project-Oriented Organizations, filled with tips and techniques for organizational leaders. Order Now!
- Tracy Adams
- One additional thought on employee retention: there has been a lot of research done around the idea that people take a job for the company and leave a job because of their manager. It would seem then to follow that training managers to be better managers would reduce employee turnover. I can tell you that in my own organization, I support two groups that do very similar work, but turnover in one group is much higher than the other. Since benefits, pay, perks, etc. are identical, one of the clearly differentiating factors is the two different managers.
- Keep the good stuff coming!
- Rick: Certainly sounds right to me. And sometimes managers who report to different managers get different direction and face different constraints. So even though one seems to do better than the other, the source of the differences can be higher in the organization. In some sense, nearly everyone who gets promoted is a "first-time something" and needs training or mentoring to do that job well.
- Deborah McMillin
- Just finished reading this week's newsletter about retention. Hmm. I have read in numerous newsletters and magazines and heard on TV news programs the same advice you are suggesting in hopes of retaining current employees. My response is always the same, "If they want to leave, then leave."
- As you say, "Most job shifters convince themselves that their new jobs are steps up, and maybe they are." So, good-bye and good luck. Why should I spend my time, effort, and money to keep people who don't want to be here in the first place?
- Life is not a bowl of ice cream day in and day out; you regularly need to eat your vegetables in order to maintain your health.
- It seems to me that frequent job shifters would also be remote control junkies type of people always anxious to see what else is available hoping the next shift is more entertaining, exciting, etc. Sometimes it is, but most of the time it isn't.
- There is a reason what we do is called "work." It takes sustained effort. This appears to be a characteristic some are lacking these days — especially those who want to be president of the company a week after they arrive.
- I say again, if they want to leave "so long, far well, auf wiedersehen, good-bye!"
- Rick: In many cases, I'm sure, this approach is appropriate. But not every case is this simple. The comment from Tracy, above, clearly suggests that not all employee departures are likely to be due to personal decisions (or quirks, or issues) of the departing employee. Tracy's observation is that when you see a cluster of voluntary departures in one area in the organization, it might be worth considering the possibility that the manager's approach to management might be a factor. I would only add to that that there could be other factors as well: the location of the group, the presence of a bully in the group, or any number of other activities or environmental factors that could cause someone to leave. Simply sitting by a letting people depart, without investigating why, might be a mistake. Two very pragmatic reasons: (a) turnover is expensive, and (b) something really bad (even illegal) might be happening.
Your comments are welcome
Would you like to see your comments posted here? rbrenmhXARWRMUvVyOdHlner@ChacxgDmtwOKrxnripPCoCanyon.comSend me your comments by email, or by Web form.
About Point Lookout
Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.
Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.
Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.
More articles on Personal, Team, and Organizational Effectiveness:
- Personal Trade Secrets
- Do you have some little secret tricks you use that make you and your team more effective? Do you wish
you could know what secret tricks others have? Here's a way to share your secrets without risk.
- Coping with Layoff Survival
- Your company has just done another round of layoffs, and you survived yet again. This time was the most
difficult, because your best pal was laid off, and you're even more fearful for your own job security.
How can you cope with survival?
- Down in the Weeds: I
- When someone says, "I think we're down in the weeds," a common meaning is that we're focusing
on inappropriate — and possibly irrelevant — details. How does this happen and what can
we do about it?
- Just-In-Time Hoop-Jumping
- Securing approvals for projects, proposals, or other efforts is often called "jumping through hoops."
Hoop-jumping can be time-consuming and frustrating. Here are some suggestions for jumping through hoops
- Risk Creep: II
- When risk events occur, and they're of a kind we never considered before, it's possible that we've somehow
invited those risks without realizing we have. This is one way for risk to creep into our efforts. Here's
Part II of an exploration of risk creep.
See also Personal, Team, and Organizational Effectiveness for more related articles.
Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout
- Coming July 24: The Stupidity Attribution Error
- In workplace debates, we sometimes conclude erroneously that only stupidity can explain why our debate partners fail to grasp the elegance or importance of our arguments. There are many other possibilities. Available here and by RSS on July 24.
- And on July 31: More Things I've Learned Along the Way: IV
- When I have an important insight, or when I'm taught a lesson, I write it down. Here's Part IV from my personal collection. Available here and by RSS on July 31.
I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenmhXARWRMUvVyOdHlner@ChacxgDmtwOKrxnripPCoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.
Get the ebook!
Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:
- Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, USD 11.95)
- Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, USD 11.95)
- Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, USD 11.95)
- Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, USD 11.95)
- Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, USD 11.95)
- Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, USD 28.99)
Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info
- The Race to the South Pole: Lessons in Leadership
- On 14 December 1911, four men led by Roald Amundsen reached
the South Pole. Thirty-five days later, Robert F. Scott and four others followed. Amundsen had won the
race to the pole. Amundsen's party returned to base on 26 January 1912. Scott's party perished. As historical
drama, why this happened is interesting enough. But to organizational leaders, business analysts, project
sponsors, and project managers, the story is fascinating. We'll use the history of this event to explore
lessons in leadership and its application to organizational efforts. A fascinating and refreshing look
at leadership from the vantage point of history. Read
more about this program. Here's a date for this program:
- Baldwin-Wallace University, 275 Eastland Road, Berea, Ohio
44017: November 7,
Kerzner Lecture Series/International Project Management Day, sponsored by Baldwin Wallace University and the Northeast Ohio Chapter of the Project Management Institute.
- Baldwin-Wallace University, 275 Eastland Road, Berea, Ohio 44017: November 7, Kerzner Lecture Series/International Project Management Day, sponsored by Baldwin Wallace University and the Northeast Ohio Chapter of the Project Management Institute. Register now.
- The Power Affect: How We Express Our Personal Power
- Many people who possess real organizational power have a characteristic demeanor. It's the way they project their presence. I call this the power affect. Some people — call them power pretenders — adopt the power affect well before they attain significant organizational power. Unfortunately for their colleagues, and for their organizations, power pretenders can attain organizational power out of proportion to their merit or abilities. Understanding the power affect is therefore important for anyone who aims to attain power, or anyone who works with power pretenders. Read more about this program.