How to Tell If You Work for a Nanomanager

If you think you might be working for a micromanager, but you aren't sure, count yourself lucky, because when your boss is a micromanager, there's absolutely no doubt. Um, wait, there is some doubt — your boss might be a nanomanager. Nanomanagers are about a thousand times worse. They do most of what micromanagers do, but they do it more often, and way better. Here's a little catalog of what it takes to be a nanomanager.

• Has open door policy, but the door in question is yours.
• For any task, specifies precisely how and by-when.
• When you can't do the how or you miss the by-when for a task, determines the how and the by-when of determining the new how and the new by-when.
• Does the things you're supposed to do, but still insists that you do them too.
• Is too busy doing your job to pay any attention to own job.
• Can't tolerate incompetent subordinates.
• Can't tolerate competent subordinates.
• Demands the impossible.
• Is clueless about difference between what's possible and what's not.
• Doesn't understand — and therefore rejects — all explanations of why the impossible is impossible.
• Blames subordinates for all failures.
• Claims responsibility for all successes.
• Sees no need to recognize contributions of subordinates, since there aren't any.
• Makes Captain Queeg and Captain Bligh look like management geniuses.
• Has fingers in everything, but has no idea where anything stands.
• Demands next status report before previous status report is completed.
• Claims all assignments are clear and unambiguous.
• Won't supply clear answers to questions about ambiguous assignments.
• Corrects the way you ask clarifying questions about ambiguous assignments.
• Has said, "I don't like surprises," but gets obvious thrills from surprising subordinates.
• Nanomanagers are like
  micromanagers, but about
  1000 times worseIs isolated from peers, with possible exception of other nanomanagers.
• Changes directions frequently, but doesn't necessarily inform subordinates.
• When contradicted by Reality, or by own boss, claims never to have said or believed what was contradicted.
• Can't always resist the urge to tell subordinates how to use the phone system.
• Doesn't actually know how to use the phone system.
• Sits in on meetings chaired by subordinates, saying, "Pretend I'm not here," then hijacks the meeting.
• Insists on signing off on all decisions of subordinates, and regularly rejects some.
• Countermands decisions of subordinates, then makes same decisions a few days later.
• Can't always coherently explain what was wrong with rejected decisions.
• Never takes vacation.
• Does get sick from time to time, but comes to work anyway, saying, "I'm needed."
• Takes sick days only for major surgery, and then only while still anesthetized.
• Periodically tries to build rapport with subordinates, by stopping by for friendly, relaxed chats, but only when hard deadline is imminent.
• Strenuously denies micromanaging anyone, ever.

There's more, but do I have to spell it out for you? (Just kidding.)  Top    Next Issue

Is every other day a tense, anxious, angry misery as you watch people around you, who couldn't even think their way through a game of Jacks, win at workplace politics and steal the credit and glory for just about everyone's best work including yours? Read 303 Secrets of Workplace Politics, filled with tips and techniques for succeeding in workplace politics. More info

For a survey of tactics for managing pressure, take a look at the series that begins with "Managing Pressure: Communications and Expectations," Point Lookout for December 13, 2006.

For more about micromanagement, see "When Your Boss Is a Micromanager," Point Lookout for December 5, 2001; "There Are No Micromanagers," Point Lookout for January 7, 2004; "Are You Micromanaging Yourself?," Point Lookout for November 24, 2004; "Reverse Micromanagement," Point Lookout for July 18, 2007; and "Lateral Micromanagement," Point Lookout for September 10, 2008.

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Workplace Politics:

The Advantages of Political Attack: II

In workplace politics, attackers are often surprisingly successful with even the flimsiest assertions. Often, they prevail, in part, because they can choose the time and venue for their attacks. They also have the advantage of preparation. How can targets respond effectively?

Stalking the Elephant in the Room: II

When everyone is thinking something that no one dares discuss, we say that there is "an elephant in the room." Free-ranging elephants are expensive and dangerous to both the organization and its people. Here's Part II of a catalog of indicators that elephants are about.

Narcissistic Behavior at Work: IX

An arrogant demeanor is widely viewed as a hallmark of the narcissist. But truly narcissistic arrogance is off the charts. It's something beyond the merely annoying arrogance of a sometimes-obnoxious individual. What is narcissistic arrogance and how can we cope with it?

Critical Communications

From time to time, we're responsible for sending critical communications — essential messages that the intended recipients must have. It's a heavy responsibility that can bear some risk. A strategy for managing those risks involves three messages.

Workplace Politics and Social Exclusion: I

In the workplace, social exclusion is the practice of systematically excluding someone from activities in which they would otherwise be invited to participate. When used in workplace politics, it's ruinous for the person excluded, and expensive to the organization.

See also Workplace Politics and Workplace Politics for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming December 11: White Water Rafting as a Metaphor for Group Development

Tuckman's model of small group development, best known as "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing," applies better to development of some groups than to others. We can use a metaphor to explore how the model applies to Storming in task-oriented work groups. Available here and by RSS on December 11.

And on December 18: Subgrouping and Conway's Law

When task-oriented work groups address complex tasks, they might form subgroups to address subtasks. The structure of the subgroups and the order in which they form depend on the structure of the group's task and the sequencing of the subtasks. Available here and by RSS on December 18.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenyrWpTxHuyCrjZbUpner@ChacnoFNuSyWlVzCaGfooCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info