Project Procrastination

In project work, we must schedule the start dates and end dates of tasks even when we don't know with certainty when we can start or how long the tasks will take to complete. The problem is actually worse than that, because we don't even know the probability distributions of task durations for most tasks. In the end, schedules aren't much more than well-informed guesses. For some tasks, our well-informed guess is vague — the time to completion will be long, and it might even be twice that.

A project that includes such a task can be difficult to schedule. But this situation is common enough that it's useful to have a name for this kind of task. I call them "demonic tasks." All other tasks are non-demonic.

We tend to deal with demonic tasks by procrastinating. That is, we push them out into the future, and redefine them as needed, so as to limit the amount of work that depends on them. That makes the schedule seem more manageable, but of course we can't finish a project until we've dealt with all its demonic tasks.

We don't use the term procrastination when referring to all this pushing out into the future, but often that's what it is. Here's a little catalog of forms of procrastination that appear to be something else. For each one I also provide an approach that can be more useful than the standard approach.

Artificially elevating the priority of something else

Sometimes, we convince ourselves that before tackling a particular demonic task ("D"), it's necessary or advantageous to address one or more non-demonic tasks. In this way, we can convince ourselves that we aren't procrastinating dealing with D.

Usually we're aware that a task might be demonic. What remains outside our awareness is that we're fooling ourselves by categorizing a task as possibly demonic. Use a red team or a curmudgeon team to assess the validity of categorizing a task as only possibly demonic. [Brenner 2019.3] [Brenner 2024]

Someone will have a brilliant idea by then

Although miracles do happen, relying on miracles
to make a project plan workable isn't a good idea

Although miracles do happen, relying on miracles to make a project plan workable isn't a good idea.

Variants of this approach that can work include exploratory prototyping and experimental research, provided that they include an explicit acknowledgment that they might not produce solutions. If the fruits of research are essential parts of your plan, determine a deadline that triggers project cancellation (or some other radical action) if the research doesn't provide what's needed.

Distaste for unpleasant, high-risk, or low-status tasks

If project success depends on some piece of work that everyone finds unpleasant or personally risky, recruiting people to do that work can be difficult. Candidates might refuse, or they might require some kind of compensation that isn't available. So we delay the task, telling ourselves that "by then" we'll figure out a way to convince people to take it on. Or if we can't do it that way, we'll just order someone to do it. That approach is unpalatable and it might not work.

Recognize that the project as currently conceived has a fatal flaw. It requires that we find people to perform work that they might not ever agree to do. Another approach is required: outsourcing, increased incentives, or changes in objectives. Set realistic goals and provide a realistic budget.

Defer the demonic task until after my departure

This is the strategy of the narcissistic project lead or project sponsor, for whom the only effect that matters is the effect on the career of the narcissist. [Brenner 2018] Tragically, and usually, only the narcissist knows that this strategy is the one being executed, because the departure plans of the narcissist are usually closely held. Everyone else, under the spell of the narcissist, accepts the project plan at face value.

Only someone organizationally superior to the narcissistic project lead can remedy this situation.

Placating conflict

When there is conflict within the organization regarding the demonic task, delaying the demonic task is one way to suppress the conflict. This tactic "works" whether the task is desirable or undesirable. [Brenner 2002.1]

But delaying the task just to suppress conflict can be an expensive error, because delay can foreclose options that might otherwise have been available. Resolve the conflict. Use a mediator if necessary.

Last words

Identifying demonic tasks is difficult in real time because self-deception is often involved. Sometimes we can't spot demonic tasks until the retrospective, when someone asks, "Why didn't we discover that until it was too late?" But we don't have to wait for the retrospective to ask such questions. We can hold a pre-mortem and ask then. [Brenner 2022.1].  Top    Next Issue

Is every other day a tense, anxious, angry misery as you watch people around you, who couldn't even think their way through a game of Jacks, win at workplace politics and steal the credit and glory for just about everyone's best work including yours? Read 303 Secrets of Workplace Politics, filled with tips and techniques for succeeding in workplace politics. More info

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Project Management:

Are You Changing Tactics or Moving the Goal Posts?

When we make a mid-course correction in a project, we're usually responding to a newly uncovered difficulty that requires a change in tactics. Sometimes, we can't resist the temptation to change the goals of the project at the same time. And that can be a big mistake.

Backtracking in Incremental Problem Solving

Incremental problem solving is fashionable these days. Whether called evolutionary, incremental, or iterative, the approach entails unique risks. Managing those risks sometimes requires counterintuitive action.

Why Do Business Fads Form?

The rise of a business fad is due to the actions of both its advocates and adopters. Understanding the interplay between them is essential for successful resistance.

Deep Trouble and Getting Deeper

Here's a catalog of actions people take when the projects they're leading are in deep trouble, and they're pretty sure there's no way out.

The Risks of Too Many Projects: II

Although taking on too many projects risks defocusing the organization, the problems just begin there. Here are three more ways over-commitment causes organizations to waste resources or lose opportunities.

See also Project Management and Project Management for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming June 4: White-Collar Contractor Sabotage

Modern firms in competitive, dynamic markets draw on many types of employer/employee relationships, including contractors. By providing privileges and perks preferentially among these different types, they risk creating a caldron of resentments that can reduce organizational effectiveness. Available here and by RSS on June 4.

And on June 11: More Things I've Learned Along the Way: VI

When I gain an important insight, or when I learn a lesson, I make a note. Example: If you're interested in changing how a social construct operates, knowing how it came to be the way it is can be much less useful than knowing what keeps it the way it is. Available here and by RSS on June 11.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenubcqSvusyBsQaEDwner@ChacfhuriyFKgDguTpuYoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info