Strategic Waiting

Sometimes waiting is the strategy of choice. Waiting can lead to the best outcome for all concerned, or if you aren't concerned for all, it can lead to the best outcome for you. Strategic waiting isn't procrastination. It isn't simply enduring the passage of time until whatever is happening (or not yet happening) stops happening (or starts). Strategic waiting is a choice to achieve favorable results, or to increase the chances of favorable results, by exploiting the passage of time.

In past issues, I've discussed several examples of strategic waiting in different situations. Here's a collection plus a couple more.

Take time to prepare your response to bullying

Most bullies know far more about bullying than their targets know about responding to bullying. When preparing to finally respond to the abuse, a common error targets make is to respond before they're really ready. Waiting to respond while making full preparations is a smart strategy. See "Biological Mimicry and Workplace Bullying," Point Lookout for March 31, 2010, for more.

Make space for others to volunteer

Usually, voluntarily taking responsibility for an unpleasant or risky task is appreciated. But volunteering is wise only if the degree of appreciation is in proportion to the risk or unpleasantness of the task. When in doubt, consider waiting to see if someone else volunteers. See "The Power of Situational Momentum," Point Lookout for February 24, 2010, for more.

Wait to accumulate solid evidence

When contemplating filing a complaint about someone's behavior or performance, be certain that you have a solid, documented case. Waiting for evidence to accumulate to a sufficient level is wise. See "The Power of Situational Momentum," Point Lookout for February 24, 2010, for more.

Solve problems with time

Creativity Strategic waiting is a choice
to achieve favorable results,
or to increase the chances of
favorable results, by exploiting
the passage of timehappens even when we aren't trying. Sometimes, setting a problem aside for a while is all that's required for generating the insight that opens the path to a solution. Waiting for your brain to work on the problem, in the background, can be a useful strategy. See "The Shower Effect: Sudden Insights," Point Lookout for January 25, 2006, for more.

Some problems vanish when solutions present themselves from unexpected sources, but that's more likely to happen if you give it a little time. And some problems are never resolved, but with time, resolving them can become unimportant or even irrelevant.

Let trouble be a lesson

Some people, groups, or organizations need to learn important lessons. For whatever reason, they don't heed warnings however sincere they might be. Waiting for a small example of the trouble foretold can be an effective means of changing minds, if the example is small enough to prevent major damage, but big enough to focus those minds.

Express opinions at the right time

When expressing an opinion sufficiently divergent from what most believe, prepare for opposition and rejection. That's acceptable. But if you express such opinions often enough, opposition and rejection happen independent of the opinion expressed. To limit this risk, wait for the group to move toward your view just a bit before expressing your view. Too much divergence, too consistently, erodes your credibility even if your views are usually valid.

How to use some of these waiting tactics might not be obvious. Give it time.  Top    Next Issue

Are your projects always (or almost always) late and over budget? Are your project teams plagued by turnover, burnout, and high defect rates? Turn your culture around. Read 52 Tips for Leaders of Project-Oriented Organizations, filled with tips and techniques for organizational leaders. Order Now!

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Problem Solving and Creativity:

Help for Asking for Help

When we ask for help, from peers or from those with organizational power, we have some choices. How we go about it can determine whether we get the help we need, in time for the help to help.

Is the Question "How?" or "Whether?"

In group decision making, tension sometimes develops between those who favor commitment to the opportunity at hand, and those who repeatedly ask, "If we do that, how will we do it?" Why does this happen?

How to Foresee the Foreseeable: Focus on the Question

When group decisions go awry, we sometimes feel that the failure could have been foreseen. Often, the cause of the failure was foreseen, but because the seer was a dissenter within the group, the issue was set aside. Improving how groups deal with dissent can enhance decision quality.

Disjoint Concept Vocabularies

In disputes or in problem-solving sessions, when we can't come to agreement, we often attribute the difficulty to miscommunication, histories of disagreements, hidden agendas, or "personality clashes." Sometimes the cause is much simpler. Sometimes the concept vocabularies of the parties have too little in common.

The Reactive Rescheduling Cycle

When the current schedule is no longer viable, we reschedule. But rescheduling is unlike devising a schedule before work has begun. People know that we're "behind" and taking time to reschedule only makes things worse. Political pressure doesn't help.

See also Problem Solving and Creativity and Problem Solving and Creativity for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming May 14: Working with the Overconfident

A cognitive bias known as the Overconfidence Effect causes us to overestimate the reliability of our judgments. Decisions we make based on those judgments are therefore suspect. But there are steps we can take to make our confidence levels more realistic, and thus make our decisions more reliable. Available here and by RSS on May 14.

And on May 21: Mismanaging Project Managers

Most organizations hold project managers accountable for project performance. But they don't grant those project managers control of needed resources. Nor do they hold project sponsors or other senior managers accountable for the consequences of their actions when they interfere with project work. Here's a catalog of behaviors worth looking at. Available here and by RSS on May 21.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenDJpmhgyaDTwBQXkhner@ChacmGoYuzfZpOvDQdRkoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info