Responses to Outrageous Demands

At times, when a powerful person makes a request, sets an objective, or endorses a strategy, we recognize it as a bad idea, fatally flawed, flat out impossible, or even illegal. We consider saying "no" in some form. Saying No is a choice not everyone can make. It takes courage because the risks are real. Some careers have been harmed, and some positions lost. Yet, when the outrageous demands of the powerful are outrageous enough — when the only foreseeable result of acceding to their demands is failure and destruction — saying No can seem like the only option that preserves integrity, principle, and professionalism.

But if the person making the demands is powerful enough, we wonder how we can survive saying No. We worry about family, finances, and career. Saying Yes can seem like the only option that preserves family, finances, and career.

So the outrageous demands of powerful people leave us with a difficult choice. Saying Yes might protect family, finances, and career, but it places integrity, principle, and professionalism at risk. Saying No might protect integrity, principle, and professionalism, but it places family, finances, and career at risk.

Life can be complicated.

As I've noted previously, when you don't like your choices, choose to look for more choices. When faced with outrageous demands, there is one more choice that comes to mind immediately: resignation. It might not work for you in your current situation, but considering it carefully as a tool in your toolbox can prepare you if it's ever necessary. Let me take a closer look at resignation. In what follows, I refer to the person making the Outrageous demands as Oscar.

Recognize that you have power

It's The outrageous demands of powerful people can
compel us to choose between saying Yes to
protect family, finances, and career, or saying No
to protect integrity, principle, and professionalismpossible that Oscar wants you to resign because his power is so limited that your voluntary resignation is the only path that leads to an outcome that meets his needs. He has no ability to remove you from your role in a way that's safe for him. In other words, although Oscar is organizationally powerful, you have power too. Along with trying to decide whether to say Yes or No to his demands, think about what you want in exchange for Oscar getting whatever it is that he wants.

Outrageousness might be the point

If Oscar's demands are outrageous, the outrageousness might arise relative to assumptions you're making. Ask yourself, "In what world would Oscar's demands make some sense?" One candidate world is the one in which you no longer play a role, or, at least, no longer play the role you now have. In other words, the outrageousness is the point — Oscar is trying to find a way to remove you. If this explanation fits the data better than any available alternative, consider the possibility that resignation might be preferable to anything else that would happen if you try to remain in your current role. Seek advice from peers, mentors, a coach, or anyone who might have useful insight. Prepare yourself by finding an attractive position elsewhere. You might need it.

Resignation need not be an all-or-nothing option

When we consider resignation, we usually think of it in black-and-white terms: either I accept the outrageous situation and stay on, or I resign immediately. But often there really are shades of gray. For example, you can try to negotiate terms, as in, you'll stay on, but in exchange, Oscar will relax some portion of his demands. Or you'll stay on for N days, and, in exchange, Oscar will delay for N days announcing the portions of his plans that you find so troubling.

Resignation need not be termination

We usually regard resignation as a way of separating from the enterprise — termination, as it were. But unless your current position is at or near the top of the org chart, moving to another role in the enterprise might provide sufficient separation from Oscar to enable you to continue with your career while Oscar continues on his path to self-destruction.

Dividing the work can be the key

If you have special knowledge of the subject matter, you might know how to accomplish some part of the work that seems especially challenging to Oscar and to others. Oscar might be willing to surrender that portion of the territory to you, thinking you a fool for trying to accomplish what he regards as nearly impossible but which you know to be readily achievable. Such reorganization might take you out of Oscar's doomed path while simultaneously placing you on a path to success. These situations are rare, but they're easily overlooked.

Last words

Malice is by no means the only driver of outrageous demands. For example, some people who make outrageous demands are unaware of the degree of outrageousness of their demands. Formulating a strategy or a set of objectives and securing the time and resources necessary to carry out that work require a degree of competence in the relevant fields of knowledge. Recognizing the outrageousness of an outrageous demand also requires competence in those same fields. Because of a phenomenon known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, [Kruger 1999] [Brenner 2020.2] incompetence in aligning resources to objectives can cause people to be unaware of their own incompetence. Unless Oscar is competent in the relevant fields, his demands might be outrageous, he might be unaware that they are, and he might regard anyone who disputes his plans as incompetent or worse.  Top    Next Issue

Is a workplace bully targeting you? Do you know what to do to end the bullying? Workplace bullying is so widespread that a 2014 survey indicated that 27% of American workers have experienced bullying firsthand, that 21% have witnessed it, and that 72% are aware that bullying happens. Yet, there are few laws to protect workers from bullies, and bullying is not a crime in most jurisdictions. 101 Tips for Targets of Workplace Bullies is filled with the insights targets of bullying need to find a way to survive, and then to finally end the bullying. Also available at Apple's iTunes store! Just . Order Now!

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

Would you like to see your comments posted here? rbrendPtoGuFOkTSMQOzxner@ChacEgGqaylUnkmwIkkwoCanyon.comSend me your comments by email, or by Web form.

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Workplace Politics:

How to Get a Promotion in Line

If you want a promotion in line — a promotion to the next supervisory level in your organization — what should you do now to make it come about? What risks are there?

The Advantages of Political Attack: III

In workplace politics, attackers have significant advantages that explain, in part, their surprising success rate. In this third part of our series on political attacks, we examine the psychological advantages of attackers.

The Costanza Matrix

The Seinfeld character "George Costanza" is famous for having said, "It's not a lie if you believe it." What if you don't believe it and it's true? Some musings.

Unethical Coordination

When an internal department or an external vendor is charged with managing information about a large project, a conflict of interest can develop. That conflict presents opportunities for unethical behavior. What's the nature of that conflict, and what ethical breaches can occur?

Congruent Decision Making: I

Decision makers who rely on incomplete or biased information are more likely to make faulty decisions. Congruent decision making can limit the incidence of bad decisions.

See also Workplace Politics and Devious Political Tactics for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming May 1: Antipatterns for Time-Constrained Communication: 2

Recognizing just a few patterns that can lead to miscommunication can reduce the incidence of miscommunications. Here's Part 2 of a collection of antipatterns that arise in communication under time pressure, emphasizing those that depend on content. Available here and by RSS on May 1.

And on May 8: Antipatterns for Time-Constrained Communication: 3

Recognizing just a few patterns that can lead to miscommunication can reduce the incidence of problems. Here is Part 3 of a collection of antipatterns that arise in technical communication under time pressure, emphasizing past experiences of participants. Available here and by RSS on May 8.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrendPtoGuFOkTSMQOzxner@ChacEgGqaylUnkmwIkkwoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info