Responding to Unwelcome Events

When unwelcome events occur, our responses tend to follow well-used patterns that have value in many situations. But the less welcome the event, the more likely we are to respond urgently. We're more likely to hastily select one or more of these well-used patterns. Sadly, what we choose in haste might not be well suited to the needs of the situation. For example, suppose you receive a text message that reads, "How did we decide this?" One possible response would be simply to answer the question with, "We reached consensus at the last staff meeting." But another response might be to interpret the question as an attack on the decision, and then to defend the decision with, "We reached consensus at the last staff meeting, and you were there." Such a response could be interpreted as a counter-attack, or at least, defensive. If that happens, we're well on our way to toxic conflict.

There is some good news here. Hastily choosing a possibly unsuitable response pattern is itself a pattern. And because it's a pattern, we can learn to recognize it. (Humans are very good at recognizing patterns.) When we do recognize the responding-with-unnecessary-haste pattern, we can choose to take greater care and choose a response that's more fitting. That's the good news.

An observation probably not from Mark Twain

There's Most of us have great imaginations,
mostly about the truly horrible things
that may happen. We often get so
busy with our imaginations that we
miss the reality around us. — V. Satiralso some less-good news — responding with unnecessary haste isn't limited to events that have actually happened. We're endlessly clever about this haste thing. For example, there is a quote widely attributed to Mark Twain that goes something like, "I've been through many terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened." Although many authorities hold that this is a misattribution — that Mark Twain neither said nor wrote those words — those words are in Mark Twain's style, and the humor is certainly elevated to the level of Mark Twain's wit. Moreover, the pattern is recognizable to anyone who breathes air. We respond in haste to unwelcome events even before the unwelcome events have even occurred.

And this from Virginia Satir

Virginia Satir, who was a renowned family therapist, has observed a similar pattern she calls living the catastrophic expectation. [Satir 1976]

Most of us have great imaginations, mostly about the truly horrible things that may happen. We often get so busy with our imaginations that we miss the reality around us.

An update of Satir's description might add some clarity about the ineffectiveness of this approach to life. The "algorithm" for living the catastrophic expectation might go something like this:

• To make a plan for today, begin by making a list of all unwelcome events that might happen
• Sort them in declining order of severity
• Make plans for surviving the first few unwelcome events (the most severe)
• If you survive, repeat the process. If you don't survive, you're done for the day — or maybe longer

Satir's observation provides insight regarding our inner decision-making process that produces not-necessarily-Mark-Twain's result. By living as though the unwelcome event had actually occurred, we experience life as a sequence of unwelcome events, few of which are real. Certainly that's a guide to a misspent life.

What psychology research has to say

Psychology researchers have identified a cognitive bias they call neglect of probability. [Sunstein 2001] As Sunstein reports, "When strong emotions are triggered by a risk, people show a remarkable tendency to neglect a probability that the risk will actually come to fruition. That is, the emotional investment we make in worrying about risks tends to be more closely tethered to the consequences of the risk event given that it has occurred, than it is to the expected value of those consequences. We tend to neglect the probability of the event and focus entirely on its consequences.

Neglect of probability, as a bias, tends to cause excessive focus on the worst possible outcome, despite its improbability. The effect on preparations for unwelcome events is to cause us to deploy more resources to some events than can be justified by their probability. This effect occurs even when we can control our urge to make a hasty decision, though haste almost certainly makes bad decisions more likely.

Last words

Sunstein [Sunstein 2001] quotes Karl N. Llewellyn: "If someone is predisposed to be worried, degrees of unlikeliness seem to provide no comfort, unless one can prove that harm is absolutely impossible, which itself is not possible." Of course, the same is probably true for irrational optimism: If someone is predisposed to be irrationally optimistic, degrees of unlikeliness seem to provide no better hold on reality, unless one can prove that good fortune is absolutely impossible, which itself is not possible.  Top  

Projects never go quite as planned. We expect that, but we don't expect disaster. How can we get better at spotting disaster when there's still time to prevent it? How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts is filled with tips for executives, senior managers, managers of project managers, and sponsors of projects in project-oriented organizations. It helps readers learn the subtle cues that indicate that a project is at risk for wreckage in time to do something about it. It's an ebook, but it's about 15% larger than "Who Moved My Cheese?" Just . Order Now! .

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Critical Thinking at Work:

The Fallacy of the False Cause

Although we sometimes make decisions with incomplete information, we do the best we can, given what we know. Sometimes, we make wrong decisions not because we have incomplete information, but because we make mistakes in how we reason about the information we do have.

On Noticing

What we fail to notice about any situation — and what we do notice that isn't really there — can be the difference between the outcomes we fear, the outcomes we seek, and the outcomes that exceed our dreams. How can we improve our ability to notice?

Wishful Interpretation: II

Wishful "thinking," as we call it, can arise in different ways. One source is the pattern of choices we make when we interpret what we see, what we hear, or any other information we receive. Here's Part II of an inventory of ways our preferences and wishes affect how we interpret the world.

When Fixing It Doesn't Fix It: II

When complex systems misbehave, repairs can require deep thought, inspiration, and careful reasoning. Here are guidelines for a systematic approach to repairing complex systems.

Double Binds at Work

At work, a double bind arises when someone in authority makes contradictory demands of a subordinate, who has no alternative but to choose among options that all lead to unwelcome results. Double binds are far more common than most of us realize.

See also Critical Thinking at Work for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming July 23: Microdelegation

Microdelegation is a style of delegation in which the delegator unintentionally communicates the task to the subordinate in such detail and so repetitively that the subordinate is offended. As a result of this delegation style, many subordinates feel distrusted or suspected of fraud or goldbricking. Available here and by RSS on July 23.

And on July 30: What the Dunning-Kruger Effect Actually Is

Although the Dunning-Kruger Effect is widely recognized, people describe it — and understand it — in many different ways. Some of these expressions are misleading. Proceed with caution. Available here and by RSS on July 30.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenaXXxGCwVgbgLZDuRner@ChacDjdMAATPdDNJnrSwoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info