The Storming Puzzle: I

If you lead, manage, charter, fund, depend upon, or contribute to the work of a task-oriented work group, you're probably familiar with two of the most widely used models of organizational behavior. One is Tuckman's model of small group development, also known as "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing." [Tuckman 1965] The other is Satir's Change Model, which describes the stages people go through when they experience change. [Satir, et al. 1991]

Applying Tuckman's model to modern task-oriented work groups can be tricky, especially with respect to considering the stage Tuckman called Storming. The subtleties have led some to propose that Storming isn't a real stage of small group development, while others have proposed that Storming happens throughout the other stages of small group development. [Knight 2006] [Knight 2007] [Cassidy 2007] [Norton 2017]

To explore this puzzle, we can To explore the puzzle of what Tuckman's
model predicts for the development
sequence of a modern task-oriented work
group, we can use Satir's Change Modeluse Satir's Change Model to examine what Tuckman's model predicts for the development sequence of a modern task-oriented work group. That examination reveals insights that can resolve some of the issues raised by Knight, Cassidy, Norton, and others. In this post and the next three I try to resolve this Storming Puzzle. This Part I outlines the plan of attack and includes a brief review of Satir's Change Model. In Part II I suggest the presence of mechanisms in modern work groups that explain the puzzling observations some have reported about Storming in task-oriented work groups. In Part III I offer a framework for understanding transitioning from stage to stage in Tuckman's model. Finally, in Part IV, I offer some examples of applying that framework.

About modern task-oriented work groups

One limitation of Tuckman's model, acknowledged from the outset by Tuckman, by Tuckman and Jensen, and by Bonebright, is the elevated risk of applying the model to some kinds of work groups. [Tuckman & Jensen 1977] [Bonebright 2010] The kind of work group in question is a variant of Tuckman's natural group setting, which many today would call a "task-oriented work group." [Forsyth 2010]

Briefly, these work groups are work groups that form for the purpose of executing a specific mission, such as constructing products, devices, documents, standards, or mechanisms. For more about task-oriented work groups, see "White Water Rafting as a Metaphor for Group Development," Point Lookout for December 4, 2024.

Satir's Change Model as a framework for examining Tuckman's model

To examine Tuckman's Development Sequence for Small Groups (TDSSG) I use Satir's Change Model (SCM) as a framework, because small group development clearly involves Change. In this I follow the guidance of McLendon. [Weinberg, McLendon & Weinberg 1999]

Numerous authors have described versions of SCM as having five, six, seven, or eight stages. Both the number of stages and the names of the stages vary, but since the fit between the model and reality is only approximate, every version of the model has some utility. The version I use here captures much of what you can find elsewhere. In what follows, and following Satir, I use the term system to refer to the entity that Tuckman would call a group.

Here it is:

This version has seven elements, including five stages and two events that facilitate stage transitions. The correspondence between these elements and Tuckman's model is my focus for next time. You can probably guess that Satir's Chaos stage corresponds to Tuckman's Storming, but much of the rest of the correspondence is both subtle and surprising.   Next issue in this series   Top    Next Issue

Is your organization embroiled in Change? Are you managing a change effort that faces rampant cynicism, passive non-cooperation, or maybe even outright revolt? Read 101 Tips for Managing Change to learn how to survive, how to plan and how to execute change efforts to inspire real, passionate support. Order Now!

More about Tuckman's sequence of small group development

The Politics of Forming Joint Leadership Teams  [January 4, 2023]

Some teams, business units, or enterprises are led not by individuals, but by joint leadership teams of two or more. They face special risks that arise from both the politics of the joint leadership team and the politics of the organization hosting it.

Tuckman's Model and Joint Leadership Teams  [January 18, 2023]

Tuckman's model of the stages of group development, applied to Joint Leadership Teams, reveals characteristics of these teams that signal performance levels less than we hope for. Knowing what to avoid when we designate these teams is therefore useful.

Beating the Layoffs: II  [November 20, 2024]

If you work in an organization likely to conduct layoffs soon, keep in mind that exiting voluntarily can carry advantages. Here are some advantages that relate to collegial relationships, future interviews, health, and severance packages.

White Water Rafting as a Metaphor for Group Development  [December 4, 2024]

Tuckman's model of small group development, best known as "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing," applies better to development of some groups than to others. We can use a metaphor to explore how the model applies to Storming in task-oriented work groups.

Subgrouping and Conway's Law  [December 18, 2024]

When task-oriented work groups address complex tasks, they might form subgroups to address subtasks. The structure of the subgroups and the order in which they form depend on the structure of the group's task and the sequencing of the subtasks.

The Storming Puzzle: I  [December 25, 2024]

Tuckman's model of small group development, best known as "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing," applies to today's task-oriented work groups — if we adapt our understanding of it. If we don't adapt, the model appears to conflict with reality.

The Storming Puzzle: II  [January 1, 2025]

For some task-oriented work groups, Tuckman's model of small group development doesn't seem to fit. Storming seems to be absent, or Storming never ends. To learn how this illusion forms, look closely at Satir's Change Model and at what we call a task-oriented work group.

The Storming Puzzle: Six Principles  [January 8, 2025]

For some task-oriented work groups, Tuckman's model of small group development seems not to fit. Storming seems to be either absent or continuous. To learn how this illusion forms, look closely at the processes that can precipitate episodes of Storming in task-oriented work groups.

The Storming Puzzle: Patterns and Antipatterns  [January 15, 2025]

Tuckman's model of small group development, best known as "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing," applies to today's task-oriented work groups, if we understand the six principles that govern transitions from one stage to another. Here are some examples.

Storming: Obstacle or Pathway?  [January 22, 2025]

The Storming stage of Tuckman's model of small group development is widely misunderstood. Fighting the storms, denying they exist, or bypassing them doesn't work. Letting them blow themselves out in a somewhat-controlled manner is the path to Norming and Performing.

A Framework for Safe Storming  [January 29, 2025]

The Storming stage of Tuckman's development sequence for small groups is when the group explores its frustrations and degrees of disagreement about both structure and task. Only by understanding these misalignments is reaching alignment possible. Here is a framework for this exploration.

On Shaking Things Up  [February 5, 2025]

Newcomers to work groups have three tasks: to meet and get to know incumbent group members; to gain their trust; and to learn about the group's task and how to contribute to accomplishing it. General skills are necessary, but specifics are most important.

On Substituting for a Star  [February 12, 2025]

Newcomers to work groups have three tasks: to meet and get to know incumbent group members; to gain their trust; and to learn about the group's task and how to contribute to accomplishing it. All can be difficult; all are made even more difficult when the newcomer is substituting for a star.

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Emotions at Work:

Getting Home in Time for Dinner

Some of us are fortunate — we work for companies that make sure they have enough people to do all the work. Yet, we still work too many hours. We overwork ourselves by taking on too much, and then we work long hours to get it done. If you're an over-worker, what can you do about it?

Coping with Layoff Survival

Your company has just done another round of layoffs, and you survived yet again. This time was the most difficult, because your best pal was laid off, and you're even more fearful for your own job security. How can you cope with survival?

Big Egos and Other Misconceptions

We often describe someone who arrogantly breezes through life with swagger and evident disregard for others as having a "big ego." Maybe so. And maybe not. Let's have a closer look.

Scope Creep and Confirmation Bias

As we've seen, some cognitive biases can contribute to the incidence of scope creep in projects and other efforts. Confirmation bias, which causes us to prefer evidence that bolsters our preconceptions, is one of these.

Contribution Misattribution

In teams, acknowledging people for their contributions is essential for encouraging high performance. Failing to do so can be expensive. Three patterns of contribution misattribution are especially costly: theft, rejection/transmigration, and eliding.

See also Emotions at Work and Emotions at Work for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming April 2: Mitigating the Trauma of Being Laid Off

Trauma is an emotional response to horrible events — accidents, crimes, disasters, physical abuse, emotional abuse, gross injustices — and layoffs. Layoff trauma is real. Employers know how to execute layoffs with compassion, but some act out of cruelty. Know how to defend yourself. Available here and by RSS on April 2.

And on April 9: Defining Workplace Bullying

When we set out to control the incidence of workplace bullying, problem number one is defining bullying behavior. We know much more about bullying in children than we do about adult bullying, and more about adult bullying than we know about workplace bullying. Available here and by RSS on April 9.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrentSgXnAlNVWlhxNIJner@ChacAtZoEYrrmofzZnjPoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info