Newly Virtual Politics: Meetings

In the early days of the Coronavirus pandemic, when nearly universal work-from-home for knowledge workers was still fairly new, you might have noticed a spate of articles in the business press about workplace politics in virtual teams and virtual organizations. With so many people now working remotely, virtual politics was of interest because so many teams or groups now looked more like virtual teams or groups.

Starting in the spring or early summer of 2020, work-from-home brought about dramatic changes. Suddenly working from home meant working solo, unless we were attending a meeting or on the phone. Suddenly there were no more (mostly) face-to-face team meetings, with one or two people phoning in. Team meetings now took place over phone or Zoom or MS Teams or something else. Suddenly there were no more clusters of people in conference rooms at different sites watching the same video feed. Now everyone from every site was logged in to the same digitally mediated meeting. Suddenly there were no more daily stand-up meetings. Now the "daily stand-up" was still daily, but everyone was actually sitting down at home. Suddenly there was no more "dropping in" on a colleague on your way back from the coffee station. Now the "dropping in" was a text message that might or might not have developed into a phone call.

Oh, and now there was the occasional barking dog or crying baby.

These changes, though superficial, have important implications for how we do our work. Consider the effects of these changes on the politics of our teams or groups.

It's helpful to begin by defining politics. There are dozens of definitions, maybe more. Here's mine:

Workplace politics is what happens when we contend with each other for control or dominance, or when we work together to solve specific problems.

In addition Because of the pandemic, meetings
are virtual. They no longer
require conference rooms.to backstabbing, rumormongering, and other dirty tricks, this definition includes constructive, collaborative activity. Positive, constructive politics has been a critical component of success in organizations for a very long time, despite the widespread perception of politics as an evil to be banished from organizational life. Fortunately, perceptions are changing. [Hill 2017]

With that in mind, there is much we can say about virtual politics at the present moment.

Meetings no longer require conference rooms

Back when a good number of the people attending a meeting were attending in person, face-to-face, meetings required conference rooms. And in organizations in which conference rooms were in short supply, having a regular weekly or daily meeting at the same time every week or day was one way of ensuring that the team had a conference room it liked. Teams could reserve their favorite conference rooms and time slots indefinitely into the future. This led to a tendency to have meetings that weren't actually necessary or were longer than they needed to be.

Newly virtual teams that are accustomed to meeting every week or day sometimes continue this practice. But because they're meeting virtually now, they can consider reducing the frequency or length of their meetings, without risking loss of access to a conference room. Keeping their meetings at a regular time is still advisable, though. Regularity limits development of schedule conflicts.

Where you sit around the conference table no longer matters

Back when a good number of the people attending a meeting were attending in person, face-to-face, choice of seat around the table could affect one's ability to contribute to the meeting. [Brenner 2004]

In virtual meetings, where everyone is connected to the meeting by telephone or video, there is no table. Seating position around that non-existent table is no longer a relevant concept. But whether you're connected by telephone or video, where you sit in the real world does matter. For audio, you want a quiet space with limited wind. For video, you want proper lighting and a business-like setting. Golf courses, bars, bedrooms, and beaches are unwise choices. [Brenner 2020]

The background of your video image matters

Let's set aside virtual backgrounds right away, because they're so easily detected that they deceive hardly anyone. Your choice of background can be a political statement that can affect how others assess your credibility. This is an example of a cognitive bias known as the halo effect. [Thorndike 1920] [Brenner 2012] When one or more attributes of a person (or, presumably, any entity) are regarded as positive or attractive, the halo effect causes us to tend to assess other attributes of that person (or entity) more favorably than we otherwise would.

For example, suppose you're choosing where to sit for an upcoming videoconference. If you have a home with an ocean or lake view, choosing to sit so as to show the waves gently breaking on "your" beach in the beautiful afternoon sun is one way to demonstrate your wealth and power. The halo effect then might cause observers to tend to assess your contributions to the meeting as more valuable than they otherwise would. If your wealth and power aren't relevant to the substance of your contributions to the meeting, then the credibility gained by demonstrating your wealth and power can result in undue influence. That undue influence can lead the meeting to incorrect conclusions. A well-appointed room, or an impressive bookshelf, or elegant artwork can have similar effects.

As a meeting participant, you're an observer of the video backgrounds others have selected. When you notice a particularly appealing background, be alert. Remember the halo effect.

These are just three ways the politics of virtual meetings differ from the politics of face-to-face meetings. Next time I'll explore differences that are more specific to the participants of the meeting.  Next in this series  Top    Next Issue

Are your virtual meetings plagued by inattentiveness, interruptions, absenteeism, and a seemingly endless need to repeat what somebody just said? Do you have trouble finding a time when everyone can meet? Do people seem disengaged and apathetic? Or do you have violent clashes and a plague of virtual bullying? Read Leading Virtual Meetings for Real Results to learn how to make virtual meetings much more productive and less stressful — and a lot shorter. Order Now!

Footnotes

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Virtual and Global Teams:

Remote Facilitation in Synchronous Contexts: II

Facilitators of synchronous distributed meetings — meetings that occur in real time, via telephone or video — encounter problems that facilitators of face-to-face meetings do not. Here's Part II of a little catalog of those problems, and some suggestions for addressing them.

On Virtual Relationships

Whether or not you work as part of a virtual team, you probably work with some people you rarely meet face-to-face. And there are some people you've never met, and probably never will. What does it take to maintain good working relationships with people you rarely meet?

Virtual Brainstorming: II

When virtual teams must brainstorm, they try to do so virtually. But brainstorming isn't just another meeting. There's a real risk that virtual brainstorms might produce inadequate results. Here's Part II of some suggestions for reducing the risk.

Toward More Engaging Virtual Meetings: I

Keeping attendees engaged in virtual meetings is a widely sought but rarely achieved objective. Here is Part I of a set of simple techniques to help facilitators enhance attendee engagement.

Disjoint Awareness: Assessment

When collaborators misunderstand each other's work and intentions, they're at risk of inadvertently interfering with each other. Three causes of misunderstandings are complexity, specialization, and rapid change.

See also Virtual and Global Teams and Effective Meetings for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming December 2: Anticipating Absence: Why

Knowledge workers are scientists, engineers, physicians, attorneys, and any other professionals who "think for a living." When they suddenly become unavailable because of the Coronavirus Pandemic, substituting someone else to carry on for them can be problematic, because skills and experience are not enough. Available here and by RSS on December 2.

And on December 9: Anticipating Absence: How

Knowledge workers are professionals who "think for a living." When they suddenly become unavailable because of the pandemic, we consider substituting someone else. But substitutes need much more than skills and experience to succeed. Available here and by RSS on December 9.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenmhXARWRMUvVyOdHlner@ChacxgDmtwOKrxnripPCoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info

Public seminars

The Power Affect: How We Express Our Personal Power

Many people who possess real organizational power have a characteristic demeanor. It's the way they project their presence. I call this the power affect. Some people — call them power pretenders — adopt the power affect well before they attain significant organizational power. Unfortunately for their colleagues, and for their organizations, power pretenders can attain organizational power out of proportion to their merit or abilities. Understanding the power affect is therefore important for anyone who aims to attain power, or anyone who works with power pretenders. Read more about this program.

• A recording of a program presented June 29, 2017, Monthly Webinar, sponsored by Technobility Webinar Series. PMI members can earn 1.0 Category 'A' PDU by viewing this program. View this program now.
   
• A recording of a program presented June 29, 2017, Monthly Webinar, sponsored by Technobility Webinar Series. PMI members can earn 1.0 Category 'A' PDU by viewing this program. View this program now.
   

Bullet Points: Mastery or Madness?

Decision-makers in modern organizations commonly demand briefings in the form of bullet points or a series of series of bullet points. But this form of presentation has limited value for complex decisions. We need something more. We actually need to think. Briefers who combine the bullet-point format with a variety of persuasion techniques can mislead decision-makers, guiding them into making poor decisions. Read more about this program.

• A recording of a program presented June 24, Monthly Webinar, sponsored by Technobility Webinar Series. PMI members can earn 1.0 Category 'A' PDU by viewing this program. View this program now.
   
• A recording of a program presented June 24, Monthly Webinar, sponsored by Technobility Webinar Series. PMI members can earn 1.0 Category 'A' PDU by viewing this program. View this program now.