Mismanaging Project Managers: Mechanics

While project managers are generally held accountable for project performance, few project managers have sole control — or any control at all — of the fundamental elements that determine project performance: requirements, resources, schedule, and costs. To manage a project in today's tightly interlocked and over constrained organizations is to confront an endless stream of changes in scope, shortages of resources, demands for tighter schedules, and increases in costs.

How Senior Managers can interfere in projects

In such an environment, the project manager finds difficulty demonstrating the minimal level of performance required to support a claim of credibility for projections of delivery on time or on budget. And Management distrust of project managers and consequent interference with project work can compound the problem. Project managers would be wise to study and understand the intervention tactics Senior Managers can use, and prepare for them.

To that end, I offer this little catalog of those tactics. This post emphasizes tactics that involve intervention at the level of project management mechanics. Examples include scope, quality, risk management, staffing, and estimation. Next time I explore tactics that interfere with the project manager's ability to lead the project team.

In what follows, I use the term Senior Manager to refer to any manager or executive with organizational rank above the rank of project manager, including the project sponsor. Below are four examples of interference tactics.

Denying the iron triangle

The iron triangle of project management is the idea that Quality is determined by Cost, Schedule, and Scope. For example, if Management wants to change Scope while maintaining Quality, either Cost or Schedule or both must compensate. Changing any one of Cost, Schedule, and Scope requires compensating change in the others to maintain Quality. Yet Senior Managers are known to deny this so-called "iron triangle," and blame Project Managers for declining Quality or failure to meet schedule or budget targets when Management changes Scope.

Rejecting risks or risk plans

When project managers present for approval project plans that contain risk mitigation plans, some Senior Managers try to reduce costs by rejecting risk plans, saying, "We aren't going to spend money dealing with something that hasn't happened yet." They see cutting risk plans as a way to circumvent the iron triangle.

But there is a high cost that many don't recognize. Even if the risk doesn't materialize, rejecting the risk plan harms project manager credibility. It creates leadership and morale problems that have real costs elsewhere downstream in the project.

Using projects as parking lots

In organizations that are reluctant to terminate non-performers, for whatever reason, demand for places to park non-performers can grow. Sometimes projects serve that purpose. For example, Human Resources policy might require three months of documented non-performance to support a termination. The firing manager must then find a three-month slot to hold the non-performer.

Projects with important-sounding charters and which aren't expected to return results soon are potential candidate parking lots for non-performers. The project manager of such a project is being abused professionally, unless he or she is involved in the scam. But most have little choice. They must accept the non-performer, but they can document their misgivings for their own safety.

Rejecting estimates of effort or duration for tasks

Even though estimates of total effort or duration might have been accepted previously — on multiple occasions — the current effort estimates or duration estimates are subject to disapproval at any time.

Some project managers prepare for such changes by "padding" their estimates. By intentionally over-estimating effort or duration, they create a reserve of hours of effort, or a reserve of calendar time in the schedule, from which they can later withdraw if Management suddenly rejects previous estimates, or makes changes that create a need for additional effort or time. One problem with this approach is that it conditions Management to believe that the project managers always pad their estimates. Management is therefore encouraged in the future to demand the impossible.

Last words

Because projects have so many checkpoints where Senior Managers can withhold approval of project artifacts, interventions of the kind described here add little of value to responsibly-run projects. But one can easily imagine many more such interventions. They generally fall in the category commonly known as micromanagement. Although they are certainly harmful to the project, they might do greater harm to the organization, as they distract the micromanager from the duties that are more properly their own.   Next issue in this series   Top    Next Issue

Projects never go quite as planned. We expect that, but we don't expect disaster. How can we get better at spotting disaster when there's still time to prevent it? How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts is filled with tips for executives, senior managers, managers of project managers, and sponsors of projects in project-oriented organizations. It helps readers learn the subtle cues that indicate that a project is at risk for wreckage in time to do something about it. It's an ebook, but it's about 15% larger than "Who Moved My Cheese?" Just . Order Now! .

More about micromanagement

When Your Boss Is a Micromanager  [December 5, 2001]

If your boss is a micromanager, your life can be a seemingly endless misery of humiliation and frustration. Changing your boss is one possible solution, but it's unlikely to succeed. What you can do is change the way you experience the micromanagement.

There Are No Micromanagers  [January 7, 2004]

If you're a manager who micromanages, you're probably trying as best you can to help your organization meet its responsibilities. Still, you might feel that people are unhappy — that whatever you're doing isn't working. There is another way.

Are You Micromanaging Yourself?  [November 24, 2004]

Feeling distrusted and undervalued, we often attribute the problem to the behavior of others — to the micromanager who might be mistreating us. We tend not to examine our own contributions to the difficulty. Are you micromanaging yourself?

Managing Pressure: Communications and Expectations  [December 13, 2006]

Pressed repeatedly for "status" reports, you might guess that they don't want status — they want progress. Things can get so nutty that responding to the status requests gets in the way of doing the job. How does this happen and what can you do about it? Here's Part I of a little catalog of tactics and strategies for dealing with pressure.

Managing Pressure: The Unexpected  [December 20, 2006]

When projects falter, we expect demands for status and explanations. What's puzzling is how often this happens to projects that aren't in trouble. Here's Part II of a catalog of strategies for managing pressure.

Managing Pressure: Milestones and Deliveries  [December 27, 2006]

Pressed repeatedly for "status" reports, you might guess that they don't want status — they want progress. Things can get so nutty that responding to the status requests gets in the way of doing the job. How does this happen and what can you do about it? Here's Part III of a set of tactics and strategies for dealing with pressure.

How to Tell If You Work for a Nanomanager  [March 7, 2007]

By now, we've all heard of micromanagers, and some have experienced micromanagement firsthand. Some of us have even micromanaged others. But there's a breed of micromanagers whose behavior is so outlandish that they need a category of their own.

Reverse Micromanagement  [July 18, 2007]

Micromanagement is too familiar to too many of us. Less familiar is inappropriate interference in the reverse direction — in the work of our supervisors or even higher in the chain. Disciplinary action isn't always helpful, especially when some of the causes of reverse micromanagement are organizational.

Lateral Micromanagement  [September 10, 2008]

Lateral micromanagement is the unwelcome intrusion by one co-worker into the responsibilities of another. Far more than run-of-the-mill bossiness, it's often a concerted attempt to gain organizational power and rank, and it is toxic to teams.

Bottlenecks: I  [February 4, 2015]

Some people take on so much work that they become "bottlenecks." The people around them repeatedly find themselves stuck, awaiting responses or decisions. Why does this happen and what are the costs?

Bottlenecks: II  [February 11, 2015]

When some people take on so much work that they become "bottlenecks," they expose the organization to risks. Managing those risks is a first step to ending the bottlenecking pattern.

What Micromanaging Is and Isn't  [April 14, 2021]

Micromanaging is a dysfunctional pattern of management behavior, involving interference in the work others are supposedly doing. Confusion about what it is and what it isn't makes effective response difficult.

On Schedule Conflicts  [May 10, 2023]

Schedule conflicts happen from time to time, even when the organization is healthy and all is well. But when schedule conflicts are common, they might indicate that the organization is trying to do too much with too few people.

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Workplace Politics:

Devious Political Tactics: Divide and Conquer: I

While most leaders try to achieve organizational unity, some do use divisive tactics to maintain control, or to elevate performance by fostering competition. Understanding the risks of these tactics can motivate you to find another way.

Conflicts of Interest in Reporting

Reporting is the process that informs us about how things are going in the organization and its efforts. Unfortunately, the people who do the reporting often have a conflict of interest that leads to misleading and unreliable reports.

Deceptive Communications at Work

Most workplace communication training emphasizes constructive uses of communication. But when we also understand how communication can be abused, we're better able to defend ourselves from abusive communication. One form of abusive communication is deception.

Full Disclosure

The term "full disclosure" is now a fairly common phrase, especially in news interviews and in film and fiction thrillers involving government employees or attorneys. It also has relevance in the knowledge workplace, and nuances associated with it can affect your credibility.

The Politics of Forming Joint Leadership Teams

Some teams, business units, or enterprises are led not by individuals, but by joint leadership teams of two or more. They face special risks that arise from both the politics of the joint leadership team and the politics of the organization hosting it.

See also Workplace Politics for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming June 25: Meandering Monologues in Meetings: Engagement

In a meeting, a meandering monologue has taken over when someone speaks at length with no sign of coming to a clear point, and little of evident value. This behavior reduces engagement on the part of other attendees, thereby limiting the meeting's value to the organization. Available here and by RSS on June 25.

And on July 2: The True Costs of Contractors

Among the more commonly cited reasons for hiring contractors instead of direct employees is cost savings. But are these savings real? Direct compensation, including perks and benefits, might favor the contractor arrangement, but indirect costs tell another story. Available here and by RSS on July 2.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenaXXxGCwVgbgLZDuRner@ChacDjdMAATPdDNJnrSwoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info